May 1st, 2012

*without losing your voice

Substitute “damn” every time you’re inclined to write “very;” your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be. ~Mark Twain

If you’re in any way a normal writer, your first draft is likely to be bloated. Not with plot or characters, but with words. Performing a good slash-and-burn on your manuscript is an essential part of editing, but learning how to find the extraneous padding quickly and easily is key. Short of following Mark Twain’s advice (and that only really works for authors with editors), here are three tips to help you find what you need to delete.

1. Make wordle.net your friend

If you’ve not played worked withwordle yet, you’re missing out. For the uninitiated, wordle creates word clouds based on any piece of text you paste into the website. As well as being great fun, you can see what words you’re using most frequently. If any of these are ‘fluff’ words that don’t add anything to a sentence, such as ‘extremely’, ‘very’ or ‘actually’, get ready to hunt and destroy!

2. Get ‘Ctrl+F, delete’ happy

Now you know your fluff words, it’s time to scour your manuscript for them and eliminate them. The quickest way to do this is to use the Ctrl+F function, read each sentence that contains fluff and then use the delete key liberally. Trust me, your reader will thank you for it.

3. Use Word’s grammar tools

Generally I’d suggest ignoring the green wavy lines that Word uses to highlight supposed grammar issues, as they are unreliable at the best of times. There are some advanced options that are useful when you’re trying to combat word bloat however.

Go to Tools>Options>Spelling&Grammar and you’ll see the third section of the pop up window is entitled ‘Grammar’. On the drop down, select ‘Grammar & Style’ and then hit the ‘Settings’ button.

Scroll down and you’ll find a ‘Style’ section where you can tick a number of options, including:

  • Cliches, Colloquialisms and Jargon
  • Sentence length (more than sixty words)
  • Successive nouns
  • Wordiness

It’s then a simple task to run your manuscript through these filters and then search for what Word thinks are issues. You can always ignore the suggestsions.

What tricks do you use when you’re editing to cut down on word bloat?

 

0
March 6th, 2012

Conflict is the life blood of the romance novel.

Are you sure, Cara? I thought it was all about two people falling in love.

Well, yes… But two people falling in love won’t stretch to 90,000 words. It wouldn’t even come close to 50,000 words. Plus, it’s kind of boring.

Sure, seeing two people who are obviously in love is cute. It warms the heart, makes you say ‘awwwww!’ under your breath. But other people in love are essentially boring. They agree with each other all the time. They have cute/nauseating nicknames for one another. And all they wan’t to do is hang out with each other.

Great for them. Not so great for someone on the outside looking in. And in the case of romantic fiction, the person on the outside looking in is your reader.

You can’t afford to bore your reader.

The way to not bore your reader is to make it hard for your hero and heroine to fall in love. Put obstacles in their way. Make the universe conspire against them. Make them their own worst enemies.

In other words: create conflict.

But how?

To my mind, there are three essential steps to creating killer conflict. Tick these off, and you’ll be on your way to making it almost impossible for them to get together.

Step 1: understand their goals and motivations, and where they clash

Understanding your characters’ goals and motivations is the first step in building conflict, both external and internal. Once you do understand them, you then need to search for the points at which they clash – these points are where conflict will flourish most easily.

An example always helps. Let’s say your heroine is an environmental activist. She lives in a rural community, close to her extended family, and works on a small organic farm. She volunteers for just about every cause that crosses her path, and is passionate about living a sustainable lifestyle.

Our hero is a lawyer from the city who’s travelled to the heroine’s small town to secure a land deal he’s been working on for months. Geological reports show there’s high quality coal in the region, and his client has applied for permits to explore. He drives a fast car, dresses in expensive suits and lives on pre-packaged meals eaten in front of his wide screen TV – at least, that’s when he’s at home. Most nights he’s working late as he climbs the corporate ladder.

So what conflicts can you see here? Our heroine is motivated by sustainable living, a simple lifestyle and preserving the status quo. In comes our hero, who’s motivated by achieving the impossible, the latest status symbols and economic progress. What do you think will happen when these two meet?

Step 2: Layer it up

To make really strong, enduring conflict that will last the whole novel, you need to layer it up. Above I briefly mentioned the idea of external and internal conflict; you need to have both of these to make a really strong story.

External conflict is what’s imposed by the outside world. So in our example book, the external conflict is created by the mining company wanting to explore in our heroine’s backyard.

Internal conflict is what comes from the characters themselves, and it’s internal conflict that you really need to focus on when crafting (or editing) your novel. Internal conflict is driven by your characters’ beliefs, desires and needs, their history and previous life experiences, and is the real meat of the novel.

Just with the brief character sketches I’ve drawn above, I can see a number of internal conflicts. For example:

  • country girl vs city boy
  • her large family vs his solo lifestyle
  • their respective views on money
  • their ideas of community

And that’s just based on the few lines above. If you delve into your characters’ past, you’ll find age-old wounds that are still impacting the present day; disfunctional relationships, absentee parents and best-friend betrayals are all grist for the internal conflict mill.

Step 3: Keep it real, play fair and move forward

You need to make sure your conflict is realistic. Ideally, conflict should be strong enough to make the reader worry about whether or not the hero and heroine are actually going to get together. And we want the reader to worry – that’s what keeps them turning the pages.

However, there’s a risk you go too far, and end up with characters who just seem to hate each other, all the way through the book. In this situation, the conflict isn’t resolved – the hero and heroine just suddenly decide they like one another, and that’s it. 

Hmmmm. Unconvincing conflict resolution results in books being thrown at the wall. To avoid this, we need to:

Keep it real

When we start getting to know our characters, it can be tempting to load the conflict on thick. One of my early heroines was an orphan who’s only remaining relative had been murdered; she’d been abused by a previous boyfriend and now her career was hanging by a thread thanks to a git of a boss.

Too much. All of that past trauma gives our heroine way too many issues to be dealt with in the space of a novel. Just one of those past incidents is enough to set the basis for some great conflict, so don’t weigh your characters down with too many past issues.

Play fair

Playing fair is all about making sure your characters have some redeeming features. Your hero can be as mean as satan, but there has to be some glimmer of light, some crack in the armour that makes his relationship with the heroine convincing.

Think about Rochester (Jane Eyre). He’s gruff, unyielding, miserable… but he has taken Adele under his wing. For Jane (and for the reader), this is a hint at what lies beneath.

Move forward

You need to keep your characters moving forward through their conflicts. Progress is important in a novel; without it, we just end up with two characters going round in circles over pointless arguments. If you’ve layered your conflicts up nicely, it should be easy enough to expose the next conflict as each one is resolved – think of it as peeling an onion!

Keeping it real was brought home to me when I watched The Proposal. This movie features Sandra Bullock  and Ryan Reynolds, and the basic conflict is a marriage of convenience. There’s some layering as the heroine travels to Alaska with the hero to meet his family and has to endure a weekend away from her normal, safe city life.

So far, so good. However, all the hero and heroine did was argue, snap and humiliate one another. Half way through, I’d yet to find a single redeeming feature in either of them, the hero was weighed down by too many family conflicts to keep track of, and they were having the same argument over and over again.

It got turned off. There was just no way I could see the conflict being resolved convincingly. I had a horrible sense that the director was just going to manufacture a scene where they’d suddenly see each other with fresh eyes, layer some appropriate music over the top, and wham – they’re in love!

I don’t think so.

The key thing to remember with conflict is that it has to seem natural, not forced – and its resolution also has to feel natural to the reader. Without natural-seeming conflict, your book might just get thrown at the wall.

And you wouldn’t want that, would you?

With love,

Cara

xx

 

 

0
March 5th, 2012

I’ve had Drood on my shelf for a while now, and as I’m starting to get increasingly obsessed with the Victorian era, I thought it was time to give it a go.

First things first: it’s a big book at nearly 800 pages. I’m up to page 26 – what can I say, my commute to work is only 20 minutes – so this is in no way a review (yet). I have to say I’m enjoying it though. It’s written in the first person from the POV of Wilkie Collins, and it’s already clear that Collins is going to be an unreliable narrator.

The novel centres around Charles Dickens and the last five years of his life after the Staplehurst Rail accident in 1865. In Simmons’ novel, Dickens meets the spectral figure of Drood at the crash site, an event that spawns an obsession in Dickens that lasts the rest of his life.

As I get further in I’ll blog more – but I wanted to share with you this description of Drood at the moment Dickens first lays eyes on him:

Suddenly appearing next to him was a tall, thin man wearing a heavy black cape far more appropriate for a night at the opera than an afternoon’s voyage to London on the tidal train. Both men were carrying their top hats in one hand while grabbing at the embankment for balance with their free hands. This figure, as Dickens later described to me in a throaty whisper during the days after the accident when his voice “was no longer my own”, was cadaverously thin, almost shockingly pale, and stared at the writer from dark-shadowed eyes set deep under a pale, high brow that melded into a pale, bald scalp. A few strands of greying hair leapt out from the sides of this skull-like visage. Dickens’s impression of a skull was reinforced, he said later, but the man’s foreshortened nose – “mere black slits opening into the grub-white face than a proper proboscis” was how Dickens described it – and by small, sharp, irregular teeth, spaced too far apart, set into gums so pale that they were whiter than the teeth themselves.

The author also noticed that the man had two fingers missing – or almost missing – on his right hand, the little finger and the ring finger next to it, as well as a missing middle finger on his left hand. What especially caught Dickens’s attention was the fact that the fingers hand not been cut off at the joint, as is so often the case in an accident to the hand or subsequent surgery, but appeared to have been severed half-way through the bone between the joints. “Like tapers of white wax that had been partially melted,” he told me later.

Drood by Dan Simmons; Quercus 2009 – pages 13-14

This description, while lengthy, is very effective at creating a sense of ominous portent in the reader; no mean feat when we’re in first person POV, and the event has been relayed to the narrator by another character. Throwing in small ‘quotes’ from Dickens creates a sense of immediacy that otherwise might have been lacking, and coupled with some horrifying details (sharp teeth and severed fingers) brings the character of Drood to life.

What’s your favourite description of a villian?

With love,

Cara

xx

0
February 28th, 2012

I’m always on the hunt for ways to make my precious writing time more efficient. As a pre-published author, I’m still working full time, so the time that I can eke out of my day for writing has to be used as effectively as possible. So when I read about The Pomodoro Technique I was excited to give it a try – and not least because it’s name after one of those cheesy tomato-shaped kitchen timers!

There’s a whole heap of information on the website, but in essence it comes down to five steps:

  1. Decide what you’re going to work on
  2. Set your timer (the Pomodoro if you can find one) for 25 minutes
  3. Work on the task until your timer rings
  4. Take a short break (5 minutes is fine)
  5. Repeat, taking a longer break after four ‘pomodoros’

Simple, eh?

The Pomodoro TechniqueI decided to give it a go today. I don’t have a kitchen timer, so I used focusboosterapp, an online version of the timer which is set at the default 25 minutes. Because I’ve been working from home today, I decided to start on some tasks for my day job.

How did it go? Really well – surprisingly so in fact. I had doubts that 25 minutes would be long enough to get much done, but I think the fact that I knew I only had 25 minutes focused my mind and attention, and I stormed through the work. In the space of three ‘pomodoros’ I’d reviewed six sets of company accounts. A report I’d been putting off for weeks (ahem!) took another two ‘pomodoros’, and reviewing a proposal document took another two.

During my lunch hour I tried applying it to writing, and in 25 minutes got 500 words down. Not bad.

So if you want to try this technique, this is what you need to know:

  1. You can achieve a surprising amount in 25 minutes :-)
  2. It’s a great way of working out how long things take you – no need to write down start and finish times, all you do is record the number of ‘pomodoros’ you’ve used on a task.
  3. The timers make a ticking noise – even the online one. Apparently this is all part of the technique, and I do think that having the ticking going on in the background is enough to stop your mind wandering. However, it makes it difficult if you’re in an office with other people. Today I was working at home, so the only ones bothered by the noise were my cats – but if I were at my desk at work, I’d need headphones to make sure my colleagues weren’t put off.
  4. Your breaks need to be proper breaks – no surfing the net or quickly checking emails. Get up, walk around the block, make a cup of tea – whatever. The important thing is that your mind is switched off from what you’re doing.

Do you think writing in ‘pomodoros’ will help your productivity?

With love,

Cara

xx

 

 

 

 

 

0
August 18th, 2011

Last weekend I indulged my muse and spent three wonderful days in the company of fellow romance writers at RWAustralia’s annual conference. ‘From here to Eternity’ was our 20th conference, and the fourth I’ve attended, and was held here in my home town of Melbourne.

The most wonderful thing about a weekend like this is the sense of suport and community it builds. Writing is a solitary profession – we sit at our keyboards for long stretches of the day with only our heroes and heroines for company. Put us in a hotel with 350 other writers however, and suddenly we realise something very important – we’re not alone!

I had a glorious weekend with some wonderful friends, and made some great new friends who I know I’ll stay in touch with long after the glow of the conference has dissipated.

If you’ve never made it to a conference, it’s a lot more than seminars about writing and promotion. On Friday night we had a cocktail party with a Roaring 20′s theme.

RWAustralia cocktail party

The Roaring 20's Cocktail Party

Saturday night is our annual awards dinner, where the ladies from the MRWG showed their glamorous sides.

MRWG

The MRWG ladies

And lastly on the Sunday we raised $15,000 for The Otis Foundation, with the help of some rather lovely firemen!

Until next time,
With love,
Cara

0
Posted in The Writing Life |
August 4th, 2011

One of the main reasons aspiring writers put forward as to why they can’t write is that they ‘just don’t have time’. With kids, work, partners, pets, friends and family all placing demands on your time, it can be completely overwhelming to even think about adding writing a book into that mix.

And yet the characters keep calling and the stories keep growing. If you’re a born writer, you have to write – if you don’t, your head will explode. (Not literally of course, but anyone who denies their true passion for long periods of time is more susceptible to depression, and depression sucks. Trust me.)

So on the assumption that you want to avoid exploding heads, the only answer is to find time to write. If you’re in the ‘I just don’t have time’ camp, I want you to try to do two things this week,

1. Find 10 minutes a day.

I don’t care what you say, everyone has a spare 10 minutes a day. The trick is that these 10 minutes hide themselves pretty well. So your first task this week is to find out where they’re hiding. Some places where I’ve found mine are:

• TV time. Do you really need to watch MasterChef/The Block/The Renovators?

• Facebook time. Oh boy, does FB eat up time. But it is really necessary to check out what your best-friend-when-you-were-five is up to?

• Lunch hour/coffee breaks/cigarette breaks. This is especially good time if you work in an office. Instead of having your coffee in the kitchen, take it back to your desk. If you’re a smoker, give up one cigarette break a day (your lungs will thank you for it too).

• Cooking dinner. Unless you’re making something straight out of MasterChef, dinner doesn’t need your constant attention. And anyway, you’re not watching MasterChef anymore are you?

2. Use that 10 minutes to write a page.

Yes, just one page. That’s all you need to do.

Here’s the maths part (concentrate). If you set your word document up with 2.5cm margins, use 12 point Courier New font and double space the lines, each page will be approximately 250 words.

The average single-title book is around the 90,000 words mark. If you write a page a day, you’ll finish that book in 360 days.

That’s less than a year.

If you want to go faster, find two 10 minute blocks and write two pages. That’s a book in 180 days. Four pages means a book in 90 days.

The other really neat thing about writing in this way is that you don’t get story-exhaustion. Story-exhaustion happens when you write heaps in one day, and then the next day realise you’ve got nothing to say – that’s because your creative mind hasn’t had the rest it needs to catch up. Little and often (a page a day) allows your creative mind to keep brewing those plot twists.

So this week, give a page a day a go.

Until next time,
With love,
Cara
xx

PS – For anyone who’s wondering what 250 words looked like, this blog post reached that around the middle of the third bullet point above. Not that much really.

0
July 31st, 2011

This is a great site for picking up interesting facts (good for pub quizes). Check out their ‘did you know?’ facts about the English language.

With love,
Cara

0
Posted in Stuff |
July 30th, 2011

I was concerned to read a few days ago that the British Medical Journal has published an article stating that women have an unrealistic view of love and apparently, as writers of romantic fiction, it’s all our fault.

Of course, romance-bashing isn’t new. In spite of the fact (or perhaps due to the fact) that romantic fiction makes up nearly half of all fiction purchased, and is one of the few areas of publishing that is still growing in these tough economic times, romance-bashing is a popular sport. Usually however, it’s limited to journalists who are looking for a quick editorial piece. The fact that this article has been published by the BMJ is more disturbing.

And not least because the BMJ should be doing more important things like lobbying the government and regulating doctors, surely.

But back to the article. The concerns I have about this publication are twofold; firstly, it’s over-simplifying some key social issues, and secondly, it assumes women are stupid.

Social issues first. The article suggests that romance novels set a bad example to young women because they don’t show heroes and heroines using condoms. Unprotected sex is an important issue, but to suggest that young women don’t use condoms because of romantic fiction is niave. Some real reasons why young people don’t use condoms include (but are not limited to):

- the fear that was instilled in the sexually active generations in the eighties thanks to the HIV epidemic has long since passed
- poor health education
- embarrassment
- getting carried away with the moment
- peer pressure

I find it incredibly hard to believe that any young woman would think ‘it’s okay, they didn’t use a condom in the book I’ve just read, so therefore we don’t need one either’.

Which brings me to my second issue – research like this assumes that women are stupid. It assumes that, just because something is written in a book, we will believe it absolutely.

I hate to point out the obvious, but what we write is FICTION, and our readers are smart enough and savvy enough to know that IT’S NOT REAL. I write about vampires, time travel and demons, and I’m pretty sure my readers know the difference between what’s in the book and what’s real.

If I were to make the claim that crime fiction makes men commit murder, I’d be a laughing stock. Not only that, some researcher would point out that while fiction may influence behaviour, any apparent correlation between reading material and action would likely be in the circumstances where the subject was predisposed to violence – in which case they would have committed a crime no matter what.

So I’d like to put this forward as an idea: if someone is predisposed to taking risks with their own health, then they will continue to act in that way, whether they read romance or not. Real issues around sexual behaviour and women’s health are the result of poor health education and self-esteem, not from reading romance novels.

Until next time,
With love,
Cara
xx

4
Posted in The Writing Life |
July 4th, 2011

The last time I wrote in the first person I was 13, and was slaving over one of those terribly turgid novels that you can only write when you’re 13 – a navel-gazing narrative where the main character (the ‘I’) was a thinly disguised rendition of the coolest girl at school (hint: that person wasn’t me).

Not long after this, I gave up first person as being just too damn hard and self-indulgent and switched to multi-POV third person. This POV is great as you can move around between characters letting out little bits of storyline and emotional growth as you go.

But now I have a problem, in the shape of an exceptionally demanding new heroine. And she won’t share her POV with anyone else.

It’s ‘I’ or nothing.

Writing as ‘I’ presents its own unique set of challenges that I’m becoming reacquainted with – the main difference between now and my 13 year-old self is that now I actually understand that these challenges need to be addressed. In no particular order, I’m rediscovering that:

– using the first person completely changes the relationship between the heroine and the reader. The intensity that’s built up through a first person narrative can’t be created through the third person.

– using the first person completely changes the relationship between the heroine and the writer. For me, there’s a far greater risk of my own voice overtaking that of the heroine, in spite of her strength.

– using the first person changes the way you structure the novel. No more showing your reader what’s in the basement, then letting them squirm as the heroine decides to go investigate in her underwear while a storm rages outside and cuts the power. No, now the reader discovers what’s in the basement at exactly the same moment the heroine does…

These challenges are not insurmountable, but they do make the process of writing this novel more complex.

And I’m loving it!

With love,
Cara
xx

0
April 4th, 2011

Well, the title says it all really. You see, this Friday (8th April), I will be appearing on RWAustralia’s Blog Bites, all thanks to the fact I came second in this year’s Little Gems competition.

Oooh, look at that – two lots of self promotion in one sentence. Brilliant!

I would love to see you there, and I’ll be giving away a copy of Little Gems too!

Until Friday!
Cara
xxx

2
Posted in Submissions |